Introduction
As a Christian preacher, KJV apologist, and now a residueologist, I have dedicated my life to studying, preaching, and defending the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible. My journey has taken an unexpected turn as I have delved into the study of “residueology”, the investigation of residual evidence supporting the original wording of biblical texts before any perceived supernatural changes. In this article, I will share my perspective on these changes, the evidence I have found, and the implications for the Christian community.
The Foundation of My Faith
The KJV has long been the cornerstone of my faith and ministry. Its majestic language and historical significance have guided countless believers in their spiritual journeys. As an apologist, I have passionately defended its accuracy and authority. However, recent observations and studies have led me to explore the possibility of supernatural changes within its text—an area that has become both a challenge and a calling.
The Prophecy of Amos 8:11-12
My interest in residueology is deeply rooted in the prophecy found in Amos 8:11-12 (KJV): “Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD: And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the LORD, and shall not find it.”
This prophecy speaks of a time when there will be a scarcity of hearing God’s words. I believe this aligns with the changes I have observed in the KJV, suggesting that these alterations may be part of a larger spiritual and prophetic plan.
Documenting Residual Evidence
My journey into residueology has led me to document well over 100 pieces of evidence spanning from the 16th to the early 20th centuries. This residual evidence, or “residue,” refers to traces of how biblical verses were previously understood or remembered before any perceived supernatural changes. Notable examples include:
- Genesis 1:9: The change from “heavens” (plural) to “heaven” (singular) in the current KJV text. Historical documents and scholarly works from earlier centuries consistently use “heavens,” supporting the idea of a change.
- 2 Corinthians 12:4: The use of “paradise” instead of “heaven” in the current text. Historical references and writings suggest that “heaven” was the original term used by Paul.
Engaging with the Christian Community
Despite the substantial evidence, the Christian community at large has been hesitant to recognize these changes. Several factors contribute to this reluctance:
- Tradition and Familiarity: Many believers have grown up with the KJV and find it difficult to accept changes in a text they hold sacred.
- Theological Interpretations: Different theological perspectives can influence how individuals perceive potential changes. Some view the Bible as infallible and unchangeable, dismissing the possibility of alterations.
- Cognitive Dissonance: Confronting information that challenges long-held beliefs can lead to cognitive dissonance, causing individuals to reject new evidence rather than reevaluate their understanding.
- Lack of Awareness: Many are simply unaware of the discussions and studies surrounding perceived changes in the Bible.
Bridging the Gap
To address these challenges, I advocate for a respectful and educational approach:
- Education and Awareness: Sharing findings in a clear, respectful, and well-documented manner can help raise awareness. Educational resources, presentations, and discussions can provide a platform for others to explore these topics.
- Dialogue and Openness: Engaging in open and respectful dialogue with the Christian community can foster understanding. Listening to their perspectives while sharing research can create a more receptive environment.
- Support Networks: Connecting with like-minded individuals and forming support networks can provide a community of mutual understanding and encouragement.
- Respect for Different Views: Recognizing and respecting that people may hold different views can help maintain constructive conversations. Not everyone will agree, but respectful discourse can pave the way for broader understanding and acceptance.
My Conclusion
The journey as a Christian preacher, KJV apologist, and residueologist has been one of deep reflection and discovery. The evidence I have found suggests that the KJV, apart from spelling updates, has experienced changes that may be supernatural in nature. Documenting these changes and sharing them with the broader community is crucial in understanding the profound nature of the scriptures and their relevance to our faith.
While the Christian community may be hesitant to recognize these changes, it is my hope that through education, dialogue, and mutual respect, we can explore these phenomena together. By remaining committed to uncovering the truth and maintaining the integrity of the scriptures, we can continue to grow in our faith and understanding.
