You’ll notice that much of the evidence shown on this website that’s marked as “Evidence Link” next to each altered verse, comes from mostly the 19th and previous centuries. Here’s an example… EVIDENCE LINK. The reason I’m using this method is as follows:
- In the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries, there was little other translations to muddy the waters. I try to find those examples which were written before Westcott and Hort influenced literature. There were Catholic writings in these results, which I do my best to exclude because they are influenced for the most part by the Latin Vulgate. The Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate is also another perversion of the word of God which is eliminated from the evidence.
- Since it is the Bibles themselves that have been altered, the best possible way to find evidence of the changes is from commentary, encyclopedias, etc., of past era’s. Antichrist isn’t perfect by any means. Only God Almighty can do anything perfect and completely. So there seems to always be residue of what was changed. You just have to look for it. Google Books search is a fantastic tool to do this with if the search is timely. Google is constantly scanning old books into their database almost daily. That’s why I use this very successful method.
- Search criteria includes the grammar and verbiage that would only have been used in the Authorized King James Bible. In other words, those words and phrases which were quintessentially King James.
- I use images instead of cutting & pasting the text, because images (once they’re discovered) seem less likely to be altered than the text format. That’s why I’m able to find many of these proofs because they are embedded in images inside PDF files. I’m not sure why it’s that way yet, but an answer will probably come soon as to the why. When I do use text, it’s simply to give food to the search engines to find this site…
Here is an example of one of my proof images:
Please consider the evidence presented.
